<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sharp introduces the BDXL the first 100 to 128GB Blu-Ray disks.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://en.akihabaranews.com/54582/home-entertainment/sharp-introduces-the-bdxl-the-first-100-to-128gb-blu-ray-disks/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://en.akihabaranews.com/54582/home-entertainment/sharp-introduces-the-bdxl-the-first-100-to-128gb-blu-ray-disks?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=sharp-introduces-the-bdxl-the-first-100-to-128gb-blu-ray-disks</link>
	<description>Live from Japan !</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 05:03:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: FullHD</title>
		<link>http://en.akihabaranews.com/54582/home-entertainment/sharp-introduces-the-bdxl-the-first-100-to-128gb-blu-ray-disks#comment-67323</link>
		<dc:creator>FullHD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jul 2010 23:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.akihabaranews.com/?p=54582#comment-67323</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[*WAAAYYY* too little, waaaayyyy too late.

Only thing worth considering TODAY (not tomorrow), would be a $150 recorder capable of 0.5TB discs at under $5 per blank. Anything else, and it&#039;s just a waste of time.

Having many (many) tens of terabytes of data I need to keep, I just got last week a blu-ray recorder for the first time ever (for $120). Got a pack of 20 25GB discs with it for about $1 per disc. I still haven&#039;t used any. I&#039;m only going to use them for some family HD movies to give to relatives in a format they can easily playback, now that most have compatible players.

Otherwise, all the data, video mostly, is in hard drives. At $70 for a 1.5TB hard drive, it makes sense to buy them in pairs and keep everything double-archived that way.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*WAAAYYY* too little, waaaayyyy too late.</p>
<p>Only thing worth considering TODAY (not tomorrow), would be a $150 recorder capable of 0.5TB discs at under $5 per blank. Anything else, and it&#8217;s just a waste of time.</p>
<p>Having many (many) tens of terabytes of data I need to keep, I just got last week a blu-ray recorder for the first time ever (for $120). Got a pack of 20 25GB discs with it for about $1 per disc. I still haven&#8217;t used any. I&#8217;m only going to use them for some family HD movies to give to relatives in a format they can easily playback, now that most have compatible players.</p>
<p>Otherwise, all the data, video mostly, is in hard drives. At $70 for a 1.5TB hard drive, it makes sense to buy them in pairs and keep everything double-archived that way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
