<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Upcoming CANON Professional Camera adopts MPEG-2 Full HD File-based Recording Codec</title>
	<atom:link href="http://en.akihabaranews.com/32593/camcorder/upcoming-canon-professional-camera-adopts-mpeg-2-full-hd-file-based-recording-codec/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://en.akihabaranews.com/32593/camcorder/upcoming-canon-professional-camera-adopts-mpeg-2-full-hd-file-based-recording-codec?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=upcoming-canon-professional-camera-adopts-mpeg-2-full-hd-file-based-recording-codec</link>
	<description>Live from Japan !</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 04:55:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sharpedon</title>
		<link>http://en.akihabaranews.com/32593/camcorder/upcoming-canon-professional-camera-adopts-mpeg-2-full-hd-file-based-recording-codec#comment-58070</link>
		<dc:creator>Sharpedon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 22:43:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.akihabaranews.com/?p=32593#comment-58070</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I cannot understand why Canon still insists on launching &quot;new&quot; MPEG-2 products.
MPEG-2 is aged,inefficient and storage hungry.It is early &#039;90s technology.
MPEG-4 AVC/H.264 is much more efficient and supports up to studio quality 4:4:4 chroma(color) subsampling and up to 14 bits per color;it even has a lossless compression option(under High 4:4:4 Profile) in cases storage/bandwidth are no issue,e.g. for studio archiving.
At roughly the same Mbps MPEG-2 offers 4:2:2 colors H.264 can offer 4:4:4,i.e. the double color depth.Or quadruple of what the MPEG-2 4:2:0 profile provides.
I wonder whether the continuing MPEG-2 legacy is due to compatibility issues or designing/licensing costs..]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I cannot understand why Canon still insists on launching &#8220;new&#8221; MPEG-2 products.<br />
MPEG-2 is aged,inefficient and storage hungry.It is early &#8217;90s technology.<br />
MPEG-4 AVC/H.264 is much more efficient and supports up to studio quality 4:4:4 chroma(color) subsampling and up to 14 bits per color;it even has a lossless compression option(under High 4:4:4 Profile) in cases storage/bandwidth are no issue,e.g. for studio archiving.<br />
At roughly the same Mbps MPEG-2 offers 4:2:2 colors H.264 can offer 4:4:4,i.e. the double color depth.Or quadruple of what the MPEG-2 4:2:0 profile provides.<br />
I wonder whether the continuing MPEG-2 legacy is due to compatibility issues or designing/licensing costs..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
