Comments on: VIA Nano finally launches its Intel Atom rival

By: Xcomp

Xcomp — Wed, 04 Nov 2009 23:59:59 +0000

Ah… I always thought it was AMD who owned those chips but this is good. Now all future netbooks can play 1080p and output them to modern TVs. Have to wonder about the cost though.

By: KuyaChe

KuyaChe — Wed, 04 Nov 2009 16:15:34 +0000

to MM: yeah agreed this a notch better than 64bit (rofl sarcasm)

to Xcomp: VIA owns Nano, AMD has Neo chips which still consumes more power and average performance compared to Intel Atom.

and no this cant compete with Intel CULV’s.
this is just targeted to low end portable computing (netbooks mobiles and such), space saver enthusiast (eg car pc’s etc) and home appliance markets. CULV’s are designed for people on the go who need more power and portability and are way expensive.

By: wonderland

wonderland — Wed, 04 Nov 2009 10:34:12 +0000

Maybe a ULV Rival !!! Atom sucks nano 3000

By: Xcomp

Xcomp — Wed, 04 Nov 2009 08:47:44 +0000

I haven’t really been keeping up with computing hardware but… Isn’t this more of a new rival for Intel’s upcoming “Pine Trail”? AMD’s Nano chip are already in netbooks after all.

By: MM

MM — Wed, 04 Nov 2009 07:29:57 +0000

This will be the best 65Bit cpu ever.