<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lancer Link&#8217;s New LAN and USB HDMI Dongle</title>
	<atom:link href="http://en.akihabaranews.com/24595/legacy-unused/pc/lancer-link-s-new-lan-and-usb-hdmi-dongle/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://en.akihabaranews.com/24595/legacy-unused/pc/lancer-link-s-new-lan-and-usb-hdmi-dongle?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=lancer-link-s-new-lan-and-usb-hdmi-dongle</link>
	<description>Live from Japan !</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 04:55:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: fh</title>
		<link>http://en.akihabaranews.com/24595/legacy-unused/pc/lancer-link-s-new-lan-and-usb-hdmi-dongle#comment-53966</link>
		<dc:creator>fh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 08:36:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://akiba.dns.st/?p=24595#comment-53966</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Somehow I doubt this is intended for use with Blu-ray, as I imagine it would break HDCP protocol.

The ￥40,000 asking price is also a bit much (although it seems to be on par with similar devices from manus like Gefen). For that money, you can get a standalone set-top Blu-ray player, and have money leftover to buy a few titles.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Somehow I doubt this is intended for use with Blu-ray, as I imagine it would break HDCP protocol.</p>
<p>The ￥40,000 asking price is also a bit much (although it seems to be on par with similar devices from manus like Gefen). For that money, you can get a standalone set-top Blu-ray player, and have money leftover to buy a few titles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Signal</title>
		<link>http://en.akihabaranews.com/24595/legacy-unused/pc/lancer-link-s-new-lan-and-usb-hdmi-dongle#comment-53965</link>
		<dc:creator>Signal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 06:31:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://akiba.dns.st/?p=24595#comment-53965</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The 1680x1050 resolution would mean it is a non-HDCP HDMI compliant device. Such devices limit bluray playback to this resolution but doesn&#039;t always mean that 1920x1080 (1080p) isn&#039;t possible. 

Very curious device. I wonder if the USB is 2.0 and yes, a gigabit ethernet would seem a better choice for video playback.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 1680&#215;1050 resolution would mean it is a non-HDCP HDMI compliant device. Such devices limit bluray playback to this resolution but doesn&#8217;t always mean that 1920&#215;1080 (1080p) isn&#8217;t possible. </p>
<p>Very curious device. I wonder if the USB is 2.0 and yes, a gigabit ethernet would seem a better choice for video playback.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Speed</title>
		<link>http://en.akihabaranews.com/24595/legacy-unused/pc/lancer-link-s-new-lan-and-usb-hdmi-dongle#comment-53964</link>
		<dc:creator>Speed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 06:20:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://akiba.dns.st/?p=24595#comment-53964</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It should be 1Gbps only, so 1080p would be possible.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It should be 1Gbps only, so 1080p would be possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
