<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Samsung&#8217;s WB500, World&#8217;s First Ultra-wide Angle, 10x Compact Camera</title>
	<atom:link href="http://en.akihabaranews.com/21662/legacy-unused/image/samsung-s-wb500-world-s-first-ultra-wide-angle-10x-compact-camera/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://en.akihabaranews.com/21662/legacy-unused/image/samsung-s-wb500-world-s-first-ultra-wide-angle-10x-compact-camera?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=samsung-s-wb500-world-s-first-ultra-wide-angle-10x-compact-camera</link>
	<description>Live from Japan !</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 16:13:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: scrambler</title>
		<link>http://en.akihabaranews.com/21662/legacy-unused/image/samsung-s-wb500-world-s-first-ultra-wide-angle-10x-compact-camera#comment-48200</link>
		<dc:creator>scrambler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 18:11:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://akiba.dns.st/?p=21662#comment-48200</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are several reviews already on the Web with full size sample. 
This is not at all comparable to the LX3 which is a much better camera in terms of image quality (faster lens larger sensor ...) but does not have the reach (almost no zoom).
The Samsung is more a TZ5 competitor, but from the full size samples and the reviews out there, the quality is visibly lower than the TZ5, especially as ISO get over 200.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are several reviews already on the Web with full size sample.<br />
This is not at all comparable to the LX3 which is a much better camera in terms of image quality (faster lens larger sensor &#8230;) but does not have the reach (almost no zoom).<br />
The Samsung is more a TZ5 competitor, but from the full size samples and the reviews out there, the quality is visibly lower than the TZ5, especially as ISO get over 200.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AppleOtaku</title>
		<link>http://en.akihabaranews.com/21662/legacy-unused/image/samsung-s-wb500-world-s-first-ultra-wide-angle-10x-compact-camera#comment-48199</link>
		<dc:creator>AppleOtaku</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 08:50:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://akiba.dns.st/?p=21662#comment-48199</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m close to getting a Lumix LX3. It would be interesting to see how the Samsung performs, especially in low light situations.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m close to getting a Lumix LX3. It would be interesting to see how the Samsung performs, especially in low light situations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
