<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Akiba Interactive Review: Canon&#8217;s 5D Mark II AF Test (Beta Version)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://en.akihabaranews.com/20385/legacy-unused/image/akiba-interactive-review-canon-s-5d-mark-ii-af-test-beta-version/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://en.akihabaranews.com/20385/legacy-unused/image/akiba-interactive-review-canon-s-5d-mark-ii-af-test-beta-version?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=akiba-interactive-review-canon-s-5d-mark-ii-af-test-beta-version</link>
	<description>Live from Japan !</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 11:43:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David_M</title>
		<link>http://en.akihabaranews.com/20385/legacy-unused/image/akiba-interactive-review-canon-s-5d-mark-ii-af-test-beta-version#comment-45681</link>
		<dc:creator>David_M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 03:36:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://akiba.dns.st/?p=20385#comment-45681</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Matt_K -&gt; no sorry we don&#039;t have it, because if the camera can&#039;t make point... it don&#039;t shoot...
For this we have just try with the center point. But it&#039;s not a big deal... it&#039;s just little bit difficult to follow. &lt;img src=&quot;http://www.akihabaranews.com/img/wink.gif&quot; width=&quot;15&quot; height=&quot;15&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; alt=&quot;&quot;/&gt;

halc -&gt; we will try.

IppikiOkami -&gt; we make the comparative 5D VS 5D Mark II today.

tenshi -&gt; for now everything in video mode is automatic, we can juste change exposure bracketing (and the focus is manual)... but remember it&#039;s an beta version of firmware, and Canon toll us that the video mode will be better on final version. So we hope they will put more manual settings.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt_K -&gt; no sorry we don&#8217;t have it, because if the camera can&#8217;t make point&#8230; it don&#8217;t shoot&#8230;<br />
For this we have just try with the center point. But it&#8217;s not a big deal&#8230; it&#8217;s just little bit difficult to follow. <img src="http://www.akihabaranews.com/img/wink.gif" width="15" height="15" border="0" alt=""/></p>
<p>halc -&gt; we will try.</p>
<p>IppikiOkami -&gt; we make the comparative 5D VS 5D Mark II today.</p>
<p>tenshi -&gt; for now everything in video mode is automatic, we can juste change exposure bracketing (and the focus is manual)&#8230; but remember it&#8217;s an beta version of firmware, and Canon toll us that the video mode will be better on final version. So we hope they will put more manual settings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tenshi</title>
		<link>http://en.akihabaranews.com/20385/legacy-unused/image/akiba-interactive-review-canon-s-5d-mark-ii-af-test-beta-version#comment-45680</link>
		<dc:creator>tenshi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 14:43:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://akiba.dns.st/?p=20385#comment-45680</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What about the video mode? Could you comment on the level of manual settings available in this camera?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about the video mode? Could you comment on the level of manual settings available in this camera?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daimaou</title>
		<link>http://en.akihabaranews.com/20385/legacy-unused/image/akiba-interactive-review-canon-s-5d-mark-ii-af-test-beta-version#comment-45679</link>
		<dc:creator>Daimaou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 01:31:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://akiba.dns.st/?p=20385#comment-45679</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We will come to that later (with a shot by shot comparison)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We will come to that later (with a shot by shot comparison)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IppikiOkami</title>
		<link>http://en.akihabaranews.com/20385/legacy-unused/image/akiba-interactive-review-canon-s-5d-mark-ii-af-test-beta-version#comment-45678</link>
		<dc:creator>IppikiOkami</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 01:23:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://akiba.dns.st/?p=20385#comment-45678</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Agreed, what is your verdict over the 5d? i think that&#039;s the main question people are wondering]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed, what is your verdict over the 5d? i think that&#8217;s the main question people are wondering</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: halc</title>
		<link>http://en.akihabaranews.com/20385/legacy-unused/image/akiba-interactive-review-canon-s-5d-mark-ii-af-test-beta-version#comment-45677</link>
		<dc:creator>halc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 20:45:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://akiba.dns.st/?p=20385#comment-45677</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the test.

I have a further suggestion for you to test.

Canon AF has not been the best under following conditions:

 - lens wide open (f1.&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.akihabaranews.com/img/cool.gif&quot; width=&quot;15&quot; height=&quot;15&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; alt=&quot;&quot;/&gt;
 - low light 
 - high ISO (ISO 6400)
 - low contrast in the scene

Under these conditions, the AF may often &#039;hunt&#039; and fail to lock or then misfocus.

Please consider testing under low light conditions (no subject under spot light) @ wide open and at high ISO.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the test.</p>
<p>I have a further suggestion for you to test.</p>
<p>Canon AF has not been the best under following conditions:</p>
<p> &#8211; lens wide open (f1.<img src="http://www.akihabaranews.com/img/cool.gif" width="15" height="15" border="0" alt=""/><br />
 &#8211; low light<br />
 &#8211; high ISO (ISO 6400)<br />
 &#8211; low contrast in the scene</p>
<p>Under these conditions, the AF may often &#8216;hunt&#8217; and fail to lock or then misfocus.</p>
<p>Please consider testing under low light conditions (no subject under spot light) @ wide open and at high ISO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt_K</title>
		<link>http://en.akihabaranews.com/20385/legacy-unused/image/akiba-interactive-review-canon-s-5d-mark-ii-af-test-beta-version#comment-45676</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt_K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 17:37:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://akiba.dns.st/?p=20385#comment-45676</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for doing the AF test.  I&#039;m a bit unsure what the verdict means though.  I get that the AF is not as good as the 1dMkIII (didn&#039;t expect it to be) but not sure if its better or worse than the 5d or 20/30/40/50d when the subject is moving.  Do you have any way to quantify your statement &quot;got some difficulties to follow if the photographer or the subject is moving.&quot; ?  Is that for all focus points or just the outer?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for doing the AF test.  I&#8217;m a bit unsure what the verdict means though.  I get that the AF is not as good as the 1dMkIII (didn&#8217;t expect it to be) but not sure if its better or worse than the 5d or 20/30/40/50d when the subject is moving.  Do you have any way to quantify your statement &#8220;got some difficulties to follow if the photographer or the subject is moving.&#8221; ?  Is that for all focus points or just the outer?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
