<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Samsung Showcases the World’s First Mass Produced 55 inch OLED TV</title>
	<atom:link href="http://en.akihabaranews.com/111989/home-entertainment/samsung-showcases-the-world%E2%80%99s-first-mass-produced-55-inch-oled-tv/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://en.akihabaranews.com/111989/home-entertainment/samsung-showcases-the-world%e2%80%99s-first-mass-produced-55-inch-oled-tv?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=samsung-showcases-the-world%25e2%2580%2599s-first-mass-produced-55-inch-oled-tv</link>
	<description>Live from Japan !</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 00:12:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: TooLittleTooLate</title>
		<link>http://en.akihabaranews.com/111989/home-entertainment/samsung-showcases-the-world%e2%80%99s-first-mass-produced-55-inch-oled-tv#comment-93291</link>
		<dc:creator>TooLittleTooLate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 09:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.akihabaranews.com/?p=111989#comment-93291</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The rumored $9000+ price tag is a mistake. In a market with fine 60&quot; 480hz models (or even 900hz+) with &lt;150W power consumption and excellent contrast ratio for well under $3000, there is just not enough advantages in this OLED at this price. The most I would be willing to pay for a smaller 55&quot; unit with slower refresh only &#039;cos it&#039;s cool to be thin (and have a small bezel) would be ... well, $3000. But as soon as 4K Tv&#039;s show up at year&#039;s end, I&#039;m buying one instead anyway. For my media play usage what I need is (ideally) a 60&quot; 4K panel fast enough for 3D (though I rather have it passive polarized, but can live with active). Don&#039;t care if it is OLED (preferred &#039;cos it&#039;s thin and light plus uses little power even though it ages much faster than others) or any other tech.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The rumored $9000+ price tag is a mistake. In a market with fine 60&#8243; 480hz models (or even 900hz+) with &lt;150W power consumption and excellent contrast ratio for well under $3000, there is just not enough advantages in this OLED at this price. The most I would be willing to pay for a smaller 55&quot; unit with slower refresh only &#039;cos it&#039;s cool to be thin (and have a small bezel) would be &#8230; well, $3000. But as soon as 4K Tv&#039;s show up at year&#039;s end, I&#039;m buying one instead anyway. For my media play usage what I need is (ideally) a 60&quot; 4K panel fast enough for 3D (though I rather have it passive polarized, but can live with active). Don&#039;t care if it is OLED (preferred &#039;cos it&#039;s thin and light plus uses little power even though it ages much faster than others) or any other tech.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
