Comments on: Sharp demos the first 8K4K display

By: Ryan Osborne

Ryan Osborne — Sun, 18 Sep 2011 17:45:00 +0000

30, google NHK for what the camera can record.

But as mentioned in the article it is a question of use. TV, movies and most games are less than 30. And it isn’t likely that video game systems will push 60-120 frames per second for this type of screen. Consider 120 frames for 3D.. per eye? that would be stupid crazy (imagine playing burnout on that).

By: Ryan Osborne

Ryan Osborne — Sun, 18 Sep 2011 17:45:00 +0000

30, google NHK for what the camera can record.

By: AaronD12

AaronD12 — Sat, 10 Sep 2011 20:19:00 +0000

What is the frame rate of this display? Until the sources get to 60+ frames-per-second, they still aren’t going to look completely lifelike. I would rather have a 2K display at 60 FPS (not the refresh rate or emulated “240Hz” rates of other TVs) with some nice 60 FPS sources.

Movie studios have to realize that 24 FPS (film) is still far too juddery to reproduce lifelike scenes. We have the technology.

By: Agustin Ross

Agustin Ross — Wed, 07 Sep 2011 02:39:00 +0000

Cant wait to see these in action! Gonna need some serious horse power to play games at that res!! lol

By: Neodimio

Neodimio — Tue, 06 Sep 2011 20:51:00 +0000

my eyes barely notice the difference between 720p and 1080p. so why the hell bother with 8K4K? is not like im gonna get some cyborg eyes anytime soon.

By: Tiago Santos

Tiago Santos — Tue, 06 Sep 2011 17:48:00 +0000

thanks for the heads up

By: Jacekss

Jacekss — Tue, 06 Sep 2011 07:12:00 +0000

Resolution in the text should be 7680 x 4320 (not 7680 x 45320! )