Comments on: [Review] Fujifilm X100, a true masterpiece!

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Tue, 02 Aug 2011 22:09:00 +0000

Or simply deciding that the additional 5-10% improvement in quality is not worth extra thousands of $… so called “good enough” rule.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Fri, 22 Jul 2011 01:39:00 +0000

You can’t afford a m3 yet you have x100..

more like you cant afford the leica lenses.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Tue, 19 Jul 2011 05:19:00 +0000

Yep you are right, sorry for this confusion and for noticing it!

By: Aaron

Aaron — Tue, 19 Jul 2011 03:13:00 +0000

Very nice bokeh on these pictures.

By: guyfawkes

guyfawkes — Mon, 18 Jul 2011 19:13:00 +0000

the x100 is an exellent camera in its class there’s no denying that but comparing it to any full frame camera, film or digital it’s a bit pushing it i’m afraid.The lens and build though quite impressive is not in the same league as any leica m.And however impressive looking and technically advance the Eagle Speedster may be it’s just not the same as the original Jaguar E-type:)

By: nick

nick — Mon, 18 Jul 2011 12:19:00 +0000

Nice article, but I think you got FPS and buffer mixed up. The X100 does *not* shoot 10 frames-per-second jpeg or 8 frames-per-second RAW, that’s the respective buffer length. It only shoots 5 fps…